In multi-threaded, the result was 2,774.9 for AMD versus 2,568.2 for Intel (meaning the 3500X is about 5% and 8% faster, respectively). In CPU-Z, the Ryzen 5 3500X achieved a single-core result of 476.3 compared to the Core i5 9400F’s score of 451.4. It's a shame AMD didn't bundle the Ryzen 3 3300X with the Wraith Spire, as that would allow enthusiasts to crack open more of the overclocking potential.As we’ve been hearing, these allegedly incoming budget Ryzen processors are designed to take on Intel’s popular Core i5 9400F, and the Chinese site also did some comparative benchmarking with the latter. But, to keep things in perspective, Intel doesn't provide a stock cooler at all with its overclockable i3 model, and bundled coolers at this price point are generally lackluster. We experienced high temperatures in extended workloads, and the fan was generally noisy as it ran at full speed to keep temperatures in check. The Wraith Spire cooler is the lowest-end budget cooler for the Ryzen 3000 series, which shows. As we demonstrated on the second page, cooling matters, so you'll need a better cooler to unlock the best of the Ryzen 3 3300X. Very cool stuff.ĪMD didn't send our samples with a stock cooler, so we pushed a spare Wraith Spire into service to measure the impact on performance at stock settings. Hmm, you know, if I were building an AM4 system today, the 3300X would definitely supplant my choice of $85 1600AF for gaming purposes. Both of those chips don't come with bundled coolers capable of sustaining those overclocks, either. At stock settings the 3300X leads the pool of other stock processors, and with our admittedly right-at-the-edge overclock, it also beats the overclocked 7700K at 4.9 GHz and the 9350KF at 5.1 GHz. All these things play well with the Ryzen 3 3300X and it's beefy 元 cache. The Warhammer 40,000 benchmark responds well to threading, but it's clear that clock speed and IPC also matter. Now you can get nearly double the performance of the 1300X (at least in this title) for a mere $120 with the Ryzen 3 3300X. AMD skipped product-in-box (PIB) graphics-less Ryzen 3 models with its second-gen Zen+ chips, instead relegating them to the OEM market, but what a difference three years makes. The Ryzen 3 1300X, which debuted at $130 back in 2017, reminds us that innovation is still a thing. Dawn of War III on Ryzen 3 3300X and 3100įive long years of stagnation on the Skylake microarchitecture and the 14nm process has punished Intel and enthusiasts alike as we've been subject to incremental clock speed, and thus performance, increases every year. The Ryzen 5 1600AF also puts up a decent enough fight as it comes within striking range of the Ryand Core i3-9100, and tuning might unlock a bit more juice. Ryjust edges past the Core i3-9100 at stock clocks, but Intel's strict overclocking segmentation keeps the 9100 from climbing up the charts like the 3100 does when we tuned it to 4.4 GHz. It's noteworthy that the lone Ryzen chip without threading, the Asia-exclusive 3500X that you basically can't buy at a reasonable price, nearly matches the 3300X. That's plenty impressive performance from the 3300X. Regardless, it can't unseat the Ryzen 3 3300X in spite of its 600 MHz advantage after we kicked up the clocks. You can say all those things about Civilization VI, and the four-core four-thread Core i3-9350K fits the bill nicely. Most gaming software is still optimized for low thread counts and high clock rates, and some game engines even prefer single-threaded cores. Civilization VI Graphics Test on Ryzen 3 3300X and 3100 That's a trend that will repeat itself through the rest of the tests. It's noteworthy that, even after overclocking, the Rycan't keep up with the stock Ryzen 3 3300X. Put in that perspective, the fact that the stock 3100 can keep up with a mere four cores and eight threads is impressive, and turning up the clocks to 4.4 GHz propels it above the performant Core i3-9350KF. The Ryfalls to the $85 (sometimes) Ryzen 5 1600AF, which isn't surprising given the latter's six cores and 12 threads. That's nothing short of impressive and likely stems from the 3300X's 16MB of 元 cache. The Core i7-7700K holds its own against all but the Ryzen 3 3300X and 3600, but it's noteworthy that its 4.9 GHz overclock can't beat the 3300X. The Ryzen 3 3300X leads the test pool even at stock settings, with only its 6C/12T Rypredecessor unseating it for the lead. Ashes of the Singularity: Escalation loves cores and threads, but clock rates also play a role.
0 Comments
Leave a Reply. |
AuthorWrite something about yourself. No need to be fancy, just an overview. ArchivesCategories |